Bayesian Investor Blog

Ramblings of a somewhat libertarian stock market speculator

  • Contact Form

Tradesports Claim Definition

Posted by Peter on August 16, 2006
Posted in: Idea Futures. Tagged: prediction markets.

Chris Hibbert writes (in a post that is partly about the mess resulting from Tradesports’ contract on North Korean missile launches):

The fact that pay-outs are limited to the amount spent to purchase claims is integral to the institution of prediction markets. If market operators ever pay off both sides of a claim, that is likely to encourage investors to protest many more close calls.

I disagree. Having pay-outs equal to claim purchases is integral to the normal function of well-written claims, but there’s little reason to stick to that rule with a claim written as poorly as the North Korean missile claim was.
Paying off both sides was the most reasonable suggestion I’ve heard for what Tradesports should have done to limit the damage to their reputation. Experience with similar disputes (such as those on FX) suggests that traders already have sufficient motive to protest questionable decisions that it’s hard to see how disputes produced only by additional incentives could bear much resemblance to reasonable disputes. The increased incentive on Tradesports to word their claims so that fewer people misunderstand how they will be judged is likely to have some desirable effects on how Tradesports explains the meaning of their contracts.
Disputed judgments might be inevitable for exchanges that cover subjects as ambitious as Tradesports does, but there’s nothing inevitable about confusion about whether a contract was about DoD confirmation of where the missiles landed, or whether it was about what the missiles did, with DoD statements merely being used if needed to resolve any uncertainty.
(I didn’t trade any of the North Korean missile contracts).

Posts navigation

← Kanzi
Time →
  • Recent Posts

    • Drexler’s Nanotech Forecast
    • The Manhattan Project
    • QNR Prospects
    • Cooperation with and between AGI’s
    • Agenty AGI – How Tempting?
    • The ESG Alignment Problem
    • Recession Watch
    • Reward the Non-use of Medicine
  • Recent Comments

    • Drexler’s Nanotech Forecast | Bayesian Investor Blog on The Manhattan Project
    • QNR Prospects | Bayesian Investor Blog on The Secret of Our Success
    • Peter on The ESG Alignment Problem
    • Peter on Recession Watch
    • Cooperation with and between AGI’s | Bayesian Investor Blog on The Amish
  • Tags

    aging amm autism best posts bias brain bubbles CFAR climate communication skills consciousness covid diet effective altruism empires equality ethics evolution existential risks genetics happiness history honesty industrial revolution information economics IQ kelvinism law macroeconomics meditation mind uploading MIRI neuroscience prediction markets prizes psychology rationality relationships risks seasteading status stock market crash transhumanism war willpower
  • Categories

    • Announcements [B] (6)
    • Book Reviews (265)
    • Economics (165)
      • Idea Futures (38)
      • Investing (72)
    • Life, the Universe, and Everything (139)
      • Fermi Paradox (6)
      • Health (100)
      • Humor (11)
    • Movies (2)
    • Politics (182)
      • China (14)
      • Freedom (18)
      • Mideast (14)
      • U.S. Politics (73)
    • Science and Technology (216)
      • Artificial Intelligence (55)
      • Miscellaneous (20)
      • Molecular Assemblers (Advanced Nanotech) (15)
      • The Flynn Effect (15)
      • The Human Mind (107)
      • Virtual Worlds (4)
    • Uncategorized (14)
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.