<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expert Political Judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a somewhat libertarian stock market speculator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:21:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart &#171; Bayesian Investor Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-43645</link>
		<dc:creator>Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart &#171; Bayesian Investor Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 02:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/#comment-43645</guid>
		<description>[...] (Tetlock makes similar suggestions). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Tetlock makes similar suggestions). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Twardy</title>
		<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-19395</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Twardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/#comment-19395</guid>
		<description>Re: why do simple autoregressive models outperform humans? 
Meehl found that even _randomly_ weighted regressions outperformed humans.
One explanation: even randomly weighted models tend to put nonzero weight on all factors being considered. People have a hard time with more than 2 or 3, effectively zeroing the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: why do simple autoregressive models outperform humans?<br />
Meehl found that even _randomly_ weighted regressions outperformed humans.<br />
One explanation: even randomly weighted models tend to put nonzero weight on all factors being considered. People have a hard time with more than 2 or 3, effectively zeroing the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Linksvayer  &#187; Bias enumeration</title>
		<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-14603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Linksvayer  &#187; Bias enumeration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/#comment-14603</guid>
		<description>[...] , I thought initially, but &#8220;closer than many think&#8221; is the key), #11, and #12. Apparently Tetlock says foxes make more accurate predictions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] , I thought initially, but &#8220;closer than many think&#8221; is the key), #11, and #12. Apparently Tetlock says foxes make more accurate predictions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McCluskey</title>
		<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-14599</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McCluskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/#comment-14599</guid>
		<description>Hal Finney has apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overcomingbias.com/2006/11/quiz_fox_or_hed.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;created a test&lt;/a&gt; that implements Tetlock&#039;s Fox versus Hedgehog scale. I took it, trying to correct for the bias I got by reading Tetlock&#039;s book (although I doubt I know how well I corrected for that bias), and got +2 (weakly toward the fox side of neutral).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal Finney has apparently <a href="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2006/11/quiz_fox_or_hed.html" rel="nofollow">created a test</a> that implements Tetlock&#8217;s Fox versus Hedgehog scale. I took it, trying to correct for the bias I got by reading Tetlock&#8217;s book (although I doubt I know how well I corrected for that bias), and got +2 (weakly toward the fox side of neutral).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything about Prediction Markets  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Expert Political Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-12076</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything about Prediction Markets  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Expert Political Judgment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bayesianinvestor.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/22/expert-political-judgment/#comment-12076</guid>
		<description>[...] roughly as I would like (even though heâ€™s thorough enough to be &#8230; Original post by Administrator and software by Elliott Back  				 		 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] roughly as I would like (even though heâ€™s thorough enough to be &#8230; Original post by Administrator and software by Elliott Back  				 		 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

